MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003232435 · doi:10.4000/ocim.3492

Les Troubles du Spectre Autistique en musée : recherches et médiation

2019· article· fr· W3003232435 on OpenAlexaffabout
Jeanne Artous

Bibliographic record

VenueLa Lettre de l’OCIM · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicDiverse multidisciplinary academic research
Canadian institutionsMusée de la Civilisation
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPublicsArtPolitical scienceSociology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

En mai dernier, l’Ocim proposait des rencontres franco-québécoises à Montréal sur le thème du rôle social et inclusif des musées. Cela a permis à des professionnels québécois et français de se rencontrer et d'échanger sur l’accueil de tous types de publics en musée. À l'occasion de la publication de l'article de Cyrille Leriche sur l'accueil des publics autistes dans ce même numéro, l’Ocim a donc sollicité Jeanne Artous, doctorante à université de Lorraine et participante à ces rencontres franco-québécoises pour recueillir son point de vue sur la recherche et les actions consacrées au public présentant des troubles du spectre autistique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.005
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.753
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0050.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.086
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.320 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueLa Lettre de l’OCIMSame topicDiverse multidisciplinary academic researchFrench-language works237,207