MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003280323

Attractor dimensions for lattices of arbitrary size

2017· preprint· fr· W3003280323 on OpenAlexaff
Flavio Pons, Gabriele Messori, M. Carmen Álvarez-Castro, Davide Faranda

Bibliographic record

VenueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe) · 2017
Typepreprint
Languagefr
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicComplex Systems and Time Series Analysis
Canadian institutionsImpact
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAttractorStatistical physicsMathematicsComputer sciencePhysicsMathematical analysis
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

By using the link between extreme value theory and Poincare recurrences, we compute the at-tractor dimension-namely the effective number of degrees of freedom-when the dynamics consist of n non-interacting particles with a stochastic behavior. We derive the theoretical expression in terms of finite size limits and test its validity and applicability with numerical experiments. We find that the effective number of degrees of freedom in a stochastic lattice is noticeably lower than the lattice size itself. We then estimate the attractor dimension of a collection of time-series issued from finance and climate, and find that they are below the theoretical stochastic limit.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.006
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0060.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.236
Teacher spread0.202 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueHAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe)Same topicComplex Systems and Time Series AnalysisFrench-language works237,207