MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003321386 · doi:10.5206/mf.v5i1.9468

Emergence de l’écocritique dans la littérature africaine : Invisibilité mythique de L’enfant noir de Camara Laye

2020· article· fr· W3003321386 on OpenAlex
Waidi Akandji

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

venuePublished in a venue whose home country is Canada.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMouvances Francophones · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicEcocriticism and Environmental Literature
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhilosophyArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Nous assistons à une émergence de la littérature et de la critique littéraire africaine dans la discussion de l’écocritique. En effet, l’écocritique essaie de trouver des solutions possibles qui consisteront à corriger la situation écologique contemporaine en analysant les manières dont la nature et l’environnement sont représentés dans la littérature. La combinaison de l’écocritique et des études postcoloniales a donné lieu à de nouvelles pensées critiques où les idées d’identité, de terre, de culture, des rapports de force, d’environnement etc. peuvent être abordés par de nouveaux aperçus. Les recherches littéraires montrent que L’enfant noir (1953) de Camara Laye n’a pas été analysé d’une perspective écocritique. En tant que l’un des premiers textes de la littérature francophone d’Afrique de l’ouest, ce roman peut ouvrir à de nouvelles perspectives pour la discussion de cette discipline en se focalisant la mythologie africaine. Notre étude est une tentative de relecture de ce classique africain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.797
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it