MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Using Layered-Division-Multiplexing to Achieve Enhanced Spectral Efficiency in 5G-MBMS

2019· article· en· W3003400596 on OpenAlexaff
Liang Zhang, Yiyan Wu, Wei Li, Sung-Ik Park, Jae-Young Lee, Namho Hur, Heug-Mook Kim

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicTelecommunications and Broadcasting Technologies
Canadian institutionsCommunications Research Centre Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMultimedia Broadcast Multicast ServiceUnicastComputer scienceComputer networkMulticastSpectral efficiencyBroadcasting (networking)Single-frequency networkInterference (communication)Cellular networkTelecommunicationsChannel (broadcasting)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

3GPP is pursuing a multimedia broadcast multicast service subsystem in 5G (5G-MBMS) based on the latest LTE further evolved MBMS (feMBMS) system in Rel. 14. In this paper, Layered Division Multiplexing (LDM) is proposed as a new addition to the 5G technology toolbox for achieving significantly enhanced spectral efficiency for the 5G-MBMS to efficiently deliver mixed broadcast and unicast services. A capacity analysis is first conducted to derive the capabilities of an LDM-based 5G-MBMS system to deliver broadcast and unicast services in the different signal layers, under the conditions with severe co-channel interference (CCI). It is shown that using LDM can provide a nearly full-capacity unicast network on top of high-quality broadcast network. The broadcast capacity is mainly determined by the power allocations between the two signal layers. The unicast capacity can be maximized by deliberately operating the system in a CCI-limited mode. Simulation results are presented to demonstrate the capacity gain that can be achieved by incorporating LDM in the 5G-MBMS system. This study shows that LDM is one of the enabling technologies to close the gap between the LTE feMBMS capability and the 5G-MBMS requirements.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.005

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.267
Teacher spread0.243 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicTelecommunications and Broadcasting TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207