Synthesis and antioxidant activities of phenolic Schiff base monomers and polymers
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this work, synthesis, characterization, and antioxidant activities of two Schiff base monomers (1 and 2) and their corresponding oxidation products (3 and 4) were reported. The monomers were prepared by condensation of 8-amino-2-naphthol with 2,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde and 3,4-dihydroxybenzaldehyde, and then, they were oxidized to in alkaline medium by NaOCl to obtain the corresponding oxidation products. The compounds 1–4 were characterized by various spectral techniques. The analysis results indicated that the oxidation products had a chain structure consisting of randomly ordered phenylene and oxyphenylene units. In vitro antioxidant activities of 1–4 were evaluated against a ABTS cation radical and a DPPH free radical and compared with standard natural antioxidants, vitamin C (ascorbic acid), and vitamin E (α-tocopherol). The ferric reducing antioxidant power and ferrous-ion chelating activities of 1–4 were also determined.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".