All My Relations
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This chapter introduces food waste scholars to the role of social innovation in addressing the complex issue of food waste. It presents findings from the Food Systems Lab, a one-year social innovation lab to address the issue of food waste piloted in the City of Toronto. A total of 92 stakeholders were engaged in a collaborative social innovation process representing various sectors across the food system including retail, farming, food processing, food business, Indigenous leaders, faith leaders, chefs, civil society, policy makers, and more. The participants engaged in a timeline exercise, exploratory “research missions” as well as intersectoral group projects. In addition, semi-structured key informant interviews were conducted with 47 stakeholders across the Greater Toronto Area to better understand the root causes of food waste. This chapter also explores alternative conceptual frameworks, which emerged from the participation of Indigenous stakeholders. This paradigm is exemplified in the Indigenous teachings of “All My Relations.” We explain how this paradigm offers a useful approach to food waste prevention and reduction through a vignette of the lived experience of an Indigenous scholar.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.011 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".