MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003526188 · doi:10.1080/07038992.2019.1704622

Object-Based Thermal Remote-Sensing Analysis for Fault Detection in Mashhad County, Iran

2019· article· en· W3003526188 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Bakhtiar Feizizadeh, Hejar Shahabi, Khalil Didehban, Thomas Blaschke, Franz Neubauer

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Remote Sensing · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicRemote-Sensing Image Classification
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGeographyObject basedRemote sensingFault (geology)Object (grammar)CartographyComputer scienceGeologyArtificial intelligenceSeismology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Land surface temperature (LST) and soil moisture are important factors in environmental hazard modeling. The main objective of this research is to derive the LST and a soil moisture index (SMI) from thermal satellite images. A split-window algorithm is applied to derive the spectral radiance and emissivity from two thermal infrared (TIR) bands of the Landsat 8 satellite in four consecutive years (2015–2018) to serve as input for the LST analysis. First, the normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI) is computed from which an emissivity index is calculated using an object-based threshold technique. This is followed by the calculation of the LST via a split-window algorithm. Subsequently, the SMI is modeled to reflect the relationship between the surface temperature and the vegetation cover. A spatial analysis investigates the relationship between the LST and SMI with known geological faults. The results indicate that the areas with low-temperature and high-moisture overlap with fault zones. The authors discuss to what degree fault zones can be detected or predicted based on LST and SMI.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.056
Threshold uncertainty score0.111

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.222
Teacher spread0.205 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Remote SensingSame topicRemote-Sensing Image ClassificationFrench-language works237,207