A Novel Solar Harvesting Wireless Sensor Node with Energy Management System: Design & Implementation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper presents the design and development of a wireless sensor node (mote) capable of harvesting energy from shady light levels while operating from a 1.9V supply. The mote features a modular architecture with a highly compact hardware design. To minimize electromagnetic interference (EMI); the current version of the mote uses a 915 MHz low power medium range transceiver, which differentiates it from most current short range motes on the market that operate in the crowded 2.4 GHz spectrum. Innovative energy management system is developed, using a new embedded Linux gateway to aggregate the data from each of the deployed nodes, to manage the energy efficiency of the received packets. The main application of the wireless motes is envisioned to be in agricultural applications with an emphasis on greenhouse monitoring. The applications can be tuned in different areas of applications. The paper presents the design considerations, simulation, and hardware results of the system. Experimental results provide the proof of concept and conform to the design guidelines. Efficiency conversion levels were around 95%, which exceeds the market alternatives by 4%. Market price is expected to be $20, which cuts the cost of this product by more than 50% in the market.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".