MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003529207 · doi:10.21831/moz.v10i1.28766

ISLAM MENGHADAPI JUNTA MILITER DI MYANMAR

2019· article· id· W3003529207 on OpenAlexaff
Danar Widiyanta, Ririn Darini, M. Rusdi Hartono

Bibliographic record

VenueMOZAIK Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora · 2019
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicAsian Geopolitics and Ethnography
Canadian institutionsWiLAN (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesIslamPolitical scienceArtTheologyPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Islam mengalami pasang surut perkembangannya di Myanmar. Pada abad ke-1 Pedagang Arab sudah menempati wilayah sekitar Arakan. Pelaut Muslim telah datang ke Myanmar pada abad ke-9. Orang Arab muslim telah berperan dalam pemerintahan di Myanmar. Raja Sawlu (1077-1088), dididik oleh seorang guru muslim berkebangsaan Arab. Negara Islam didirikan di Arakan ketika Sultan Bengal yang beragama Islam Naseeuruddeen Mahmud Syah (1442-1459, membantu Raja Sulayman Naramitha membangun Negara Islam. Muslim di Myanmar juga melakukan perlawanan terhadap tindakan kesewenang-wenangan yang dilakukan oleh Junta Militer. Salah satu bentuk perlawanan mereka adalah membentuk organisasi, salah satunya adalah Oganisasi Nasional Arakan Rohingya (ARNO). Organisasi ini merupakan gabungan dari Front Islam Rohingya (ARIF) yang dipimpin oleh Nurul Islam, Organisasi Solidaritas untuk Rohingya (RSO) yang dipimpin oleh Dr. Yunus dan RSO pimpinan Prof. Muhamma Zakaria. Tahun 1996 terjadi intensitas yang tinggi perlakuan sewenang-wenang dari pemerintahan militer Myanmar. Puncaknya pasca peristiwa 11 September 2001 di Amerika Serikat mengakibatkan tekanan terhadap muslim Myanmar bertambah keras. Tercatat sekitar 1.500.000 muslim Myanmar harus mengungsi ke Malaysia, Bangladesh, Thailand dan lain-lain.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.043
Threshold uncertainty score0.144

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0020.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0430.012

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.259 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMOZAIK Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial dan HumanioraSame topicAsian Geopolitics and EthnographyFrench-language works237,207