MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003549353 · doi:10.1029/2019jc015522

The Atlantic Meridional Overturning Circulation in High‐Resolution Models

2020· article· en· W3003549353 on OpenAlexaff
Joël Hirschi, Bernard Barnier, Claus W. Böning, Arne Biastoch, Adam T. Blaker, Andrew C. Coward, Sergey Danilov, Sybren Drijfhout, Klaus Getzlaff, Stephen M. Griffies, Hiroyasu Hasumi, Helene T. Hewitt, Doroteaciro Iovino, Takao Kawasaki, Andrew E. Kiss, Nikolay Koldunov, Alice Marzocchi, Jennifer Mecking, Ben Moat, Jean‐Marc Molines, Paul G. Myers, Thierry Penduff, Malcolm Roberts, Anne‐Marie Tréguier, Dmitry Sein, Dmitry Sidorenko, Justin Small, Paul Spence, LuAnne Thompson, Wilbert Weijer, Xiaobiao Xu

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Geophysical Research Oceans · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicClimate variability and models
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
FundersEuropean CommissionSight Research UKNatural Environment Research CouncilFederal Agency for Scientific OrganizationsMet OfficeDepartment for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs, UK GovernmentNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsClimatologyGulf StreamMesoscale meteorologyShutdown of thermohaline circulationThermohaline circulationNorth Atlantic Deep WaterOcean currentAtlantic hurricaneGeologyClimate modelZonal and meridionalEddyCirculation (fluid dynamics)General Circulation ModelOceanographyClimate changeMeteorologyGeographyMechanicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Atlantic meridional overturning circulation (AMOC) represents the zonally integrated stream function of meridional volume transport in the Atlantic Basin. The AMOC plays an important role in transporting heat meridionally in the climate system. Observations suggest a heat transport by the AMOC of 1.3 PW at 26°N—a latitude which is close to where the Atlantic northward heat transport is thought to reach its maximum. This shapes the climate of the North Atlantic region as we know it today. In recent years there has been significant progress both in our ability to observe the AMOC in nature and to simulate it in numerical models. Most previous modeling investigations of the AMOC and its impact on climate have relied on models with horizontal resolution that does not resolve ocean mesoscale eddies and the dynamics of the Gulf Stream/North Atlantic Current system. As a result of recent increases in computing power, models are now being run that are able to represent mesoscale ocean dynamics and the circulation features that rely on them. The aim of this review is to describe new insights into the AMOC provided by high‐resolution models. Furthermore, we will describe how high‐resolution model simulations can help resolve outstanding challenges in our understanding of the AMOC.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.058

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.070
GPT teacher head0.313
Teacher spread0.242 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations210
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Geophysical Research OceansSame topicClimate variability and modelsFrench-language works237,207