MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3003711125

A System Equation Model A Comparative Study for G-7 Countries

2019· article· en· W3003711125 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Antonios Adamopoulos, Athanasios Vazakidis

Bibliographic record

VenueSPOUDAI (University of Piraeus) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsEconomicsSimultaneous equations modelInflation (cosmology)Monte Carlo methodIndex (typography)EconometricsOrder (exchange)Structural equation modelingStatisticsMathematicsFinanceComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper investigates the relationship among investments, exports and economic growth for G-7 countries for the period 1975-2017, except for Germany (1991-2017), estimating a simultaneous system equations model. The Group of Seven countries (G7) is a group consisting of Canada, France, Germany, Italy, Japan, United Kingdom, and USA regarded as the most advanced countries worldly, representing 58% of the global net wealth. Ôhe purpose of this paper is to examine the long-run relationship between the examined variables applying the two-stage least squared method. Finally, a system equation model is estimated for G7 countries applying a Monte Carlo simulation method, in order to find out the predictive ability of the equation model. The results of this paper indicated that there is a positive relationship between investments, exports and economic growth taking into account the negative indirect effect of inflation rate and positive indirect effect of industrial production index on economic growth. Furthermore, the model is very well simulated, since the simulated values are close to actual values of examined variables.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.035
Threshold uncertainty score0.070

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.002
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0070.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.221
Teacher spread0.148 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSPOUDAI (University of Piraeus)→Same topicFiscal Policy and Economic Growth→French-language works237,207→