Rome et la troisième guerre punique : unipolarité méditerranéenne et dilemme de sécurité au IIe siècle a.C.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article propose une réinterprétation des causes du déclenchement de la troisième guerre punique (149-146 a.C.), en recourant aux théories néoréalistes développées dans le champ des relations internationales contemporaines. En nous appuyant sur les travaux du politologue américain N.P. Monteiro, nous serons amené à considérer le monde méditerranéen hellénistique, au lendemain de la paix d’Apamée (188 a.C.), comme un système international unipolaire, dominé par Rome. Par le recours à la théorie de l’unipolarité, nous en viendrons à circonscrire les dynamiques systémiques qui ont pu influencer le Sénat de Carthage à se lancer en guerre contre la Numidie de Massinissa, de même que le Sénat romain à intervenir militairement en Afrique du Nord, au moment où s’ouvrait une nouvelle période de troubles à l’échelle du monde méditerranéen.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.003 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.004 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".