Investigation of resistive switching and transport mechanisms of Al2O3/TiO2−<i>x</i> memristors under cryogenic conditions (1.5 K)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Resistive switching and transport mechanisms of Al2O3/TiO2−x memristor crosspoint devices have been investigated at cryogenic temperatures down to 1.5 K, for the future development of memristor-based cryogenic electronics. We report successful resistive switching of our devices in the temperature range of 300–1.5 K. The current–voltage curves exhibit negative differential resistance effects between 130 K and 1.5 K, attributed to a metal–insulator transition of the Ti4O7 conductive filament. The resulting highly nonlinear behavior is associated with an ION/IOFF diode ratio of 84 at 1.5 K, paving the way for selector-free cryogenic passive crossbars. Temperature-dependent thermal activation energies related to the conductance at low bias (20 mV) are extracted for memristors in a low resistance state, suggesting hopping-type conduction mechanisms. Finally, the transport mechanism analysis at 1.5 K indicates that for all resistance states, the conduction follows the space-charge limited current model in low fields, whereas trap-assisted tunneling dominates in higher fields.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".