Calgary Preschool magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) dataset
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The Calgary Preschool MRI Dataset in the Developmental Neuroimaging Lab at the University of Calgary uses magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) techniques to study brain structure and function in early childhood [1-3]. The dataset aims to characterise brain development in early childhood (2-8 years), and to understand links to cognitive and behavioral development, as well as provide a baseline from which to identify atypical development in children with diseases, disorders, or brain injuries. MRI data are provided for 126 children (61 males, 65 females). Children ranged from 1.95 to 6.22 years (mean = 3.98 ± 1.06 years) at the time of their first scan and were initially scanned at six month intervals, and now continue to be followed annually (1-20 scans per child, 431 total datasets; datasets do not always have all scan modalities available). All MRI scans were acquired on the same General Electric 3T MR750w system and 32-channel head coil (GE, Waukesha, WI) at the Alberta Children's Hospital in Calgary, Canada. The MRI protocols provided in this dataset include: T1-weighted images acquired using a FSPGR BRAVO sequence; arterial spin labeling (ASL) images acquired with the vendor supplied pseudo continuous 3D ASL sequence; diffusion tensor imaging data acquired using single shot spin echo echo-planar imaging; and passive viewing resting state functional MRI data acquired with a gradient-echo echo-planar imaging sequence.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.005 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.024 | 0.020 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".