MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003787125 · doi:10.1090/proc/15395

Riesz bases of exponentials and the Bohr topology

2020· preprint· lv· W3003787125 on OpenAlexafffund
Carlos Cabrelli, Kathryn E. Hare, Ursula Molter

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the American Mathematical Society · 2020
Typepreprint
Languagelv
FieldMathematics
TopicMathematical Analysis and Transform Methods
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersSecretaría de Ciencia y Técnica, Universidad de Buenos AiresSecretaria de Ciencia y Tecnica, Universidad de Buenos AiresNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMinisterio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación ProductivaConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas
KeywordsBounded functionMathematicsBohr modelOmegaPure mathematicsLocally compact spaceExponential functionAbelian groupBasis (linear algebra)Measure (data warehouse)Topology (electrical circuits)Discrete mathematicsCombinatoricsMathematical analysisComputer sciencePhysicsGeometryQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

We provide a necessary and sufficient condition to ensure that a multi-tile Ω ⊂ R d \Omega \subset \mathbb {R}^{d} of positive measure (but not necessarily bounded) admits a structured Riesz basis of exponentials for L 2 ( Ω ) L^{2}(\Omega ) . New examples are given and this characterization is generalized to abstract locally compact abelian groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.036

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.003
Scholarly communication0.0030.006
Open science0.0010.004
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.321
Teacher spread0.280 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the American Mathematical SocietySame topicMathematical Analysis and Transform MethodsFrench-language works237,207