MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003795562 · doi:10.15407/mzu2019.28.340

Archive Component of the Source Base of Studies on the Ukrainian-Turkish Relations During the 1917-1921 Ukrainian Revolution

2019· article· en· W3003795562 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueMìžnarodnì zv’âzki Ukraïni naukovì pošuki ì znahìdki · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicHistorical Turkish Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUkrainianTurkishPolitical scienceGovernment (linguistics)State (computer science)NegotiationAllianceEconomic historyAncient historyLawHistory

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The article describes the composition and content of archival documents stored in the Ukrainian archives and containing  information on the institutional history of the diplomatic missions of Ukraine in Turkey and Turkey in Ukraine during the period of the Ukrainian Revolution of 1917–1921. The study of the Ukrainian-Turkish diplomatic relation history in 1917-1920 demands to research archival documents which are kept in the archives of Ukraine, Turkey, Poland, Austria, Canada and other countries. The Turkish scholars Khakan Kyrymly and Makhmet Farkhi Furat, the Ukrainian scientist and diplomat Bohdan Serhiichuk shed light on certain aspects of this topic in their scientific publications. A core set of documents reflecting the activity of Ukrainian mission in Turkey and Turkish mission in Ukraine is presented at the Central State Archives of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine (TsDAVO of Ukraine). The first part of this documents reflects the process of Brest peaceful negotiations. Signed at Brest-Litovsk on February 9, 1918 peaceful agreement of the Ukrainian National Republic with countries of the Quadruple Alliance (including the Ottoman Empire) became the beginning of Ukrainian-Turkish interstate relations in the 20th century. The Central State CinePhotoPhono Archives of Ukraine named after H.Pshenychnyi keeps photographs imaging the negotiation process and its participants. The set of documents, related to the activity of representatives of the Ottoman Empire in Kyiv, is preserved in the Central State Archive of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine. The Turkish diplomats arrived in Kyiv on September 8. On September 20, 2018 Consul Mahomet Ali Bei went to Odessa. Priority tasks of consuls had been considered as the protection of Turkish nationals and organization of the departure of civilians and released Turkish prisoners of war. Information about the activities of the Consulate of the Ottoman Empire in Odessa have been preserved in the Central State Archive of Supreme Bodies of Power and Government of Ukraine and in the State archives of Odessa Region. The information on the situation of Turkish nationals is contained in documents fund 4 (The National Commissariat of Foreign Affairs of the Ukrainian SSR) and fund 4205 (Office of the Plenipotentiary of the PCIA in Kyiv area). Archive information, placed in documents, preserved in Ukrainian and foreign archives, demonstrate perspectives for further surveys.   Matiash, I. (2019). Archive Component of the Source Base of Studies on the Ukrainian-Turkish Relations During the 1917-1921 Ukrainian Revolution. Mìžnarodnì zv’âzki Ukraïni: naukovì pošuki ì znahìdki – The International relations of Ukraine: scientific searches and findings, 28, 340-358 [in Ukrainian].

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies
Consensus categoriesScience and technology studies
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.808
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.003
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.032
GPT teacher head0.279
Teacher spread0.248 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it