MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3003805515 · doi:10.1136/jnnp-2019-abn-2.20

15.33 AVXS-101 in presymptomatic spinal muscular atrophy (SMA)

2019· article· en· W3003805515 on OpenAlexaff
Kevin A. Strauss, Kathryn J. Swoboda, Michelle A. Farrar, Hugh J. McMillan, Julie Parsons, Jena M. Krueger, Susan T. Iannaccone, Claudia A. Chiriboga, Jennifer M. Kwon, Kayoko Saito, Mariacristina Scoto, Imran Kausar, Meredith Schultz, Elaine Kernbauer, Marcia Farrow, Francis G. Ogrinc, Sarah Kavanagh, Douglas E. Feltner, Bryan E. McGill, Sidney A. Spector, James L’Italien, Douglas M. Sproule, Francesco Muntoni

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders Research
Canadian institutionsChildren's Hospital of Eastern Ontario
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSMA*MedicineSpinal muscular atrophySMN1Internal medicineAsymptomaticPediatrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background Onasemnogene abeparvovec (AVXS-101) is a gene-replacement therapy that treats the genetic root cause of SMA, biallelic survival motor neuron 1 gene (SMN1) deletion/mutation. In a phase 1 study, AVXS-101 improved survival and motor function of symptomatic SMA type 1 patients. In SPR1NT ( NCT03505099 ), AVXS-101 is being evaluated in presymptomatic newborns with SMA. Methods SPR1NT is a multicenter, open-label, phase 3 study enrolling ≥27 SMA patients with 2xSMN2or 3xSMN2. Asymptomatic infants aged ≤6 weeks receive a one-time, intravenous AVXS-101 infusion. Safety and efficacy are assessed through 18 or 24 months for patients with 2x or 3xSMN2, respectively. Primary outcomes are independent sitting ≥30 seconds (2xSMN2) or assisted standing (3xSMN2). Results As of 8 March 2019, 18 infants aged 8–40 days received AVXS-101 (11 female; 8 with 2xSMN2; 9 with 3xSMN2; 1 with 4xSMN2). Among patients with 2xSMN2, mean CHOP-INTEND at baseline was 44.0 points, which increased by 14.4 points at 3 months (n=7); 6/8 patients scored ≥60 points; 3/8 reached maximum score. 4/8 patients sat unassisted; all ages of sitting milestone achievements were within the WHO range (1st–99th percentile: 3.8–9.2 months). Conclusions Preliminary data from SPR1NT show rapid motor function improvements in presymptomatic SMA patients.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Non-randomized trial · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.020
Threshold uncertainty score0.067

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0200.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.010
GPT teacher head0.277
Teacher spread0.267 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNon-randomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Neurology Neurosurgery & PsychiatrySame topicNeurogenetic and Muscular Disorders ResearchFrench-language works237,207