MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modeling layout, distribution and breakdown effects in GaN HEMTs in the MVSG approach

2019· article· en· W3003818734 on OpenAlexaff
Khandker Akif Aabrar, Lan Wei, Ujwal Radhakrishna

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHigh-electron-mobility transistorScalingBreakdown voltageOptoelectronicsDiodeGallium nitrideMaterials scienceElectronic engineeringChannel (broadcasting)Logic gateParasitic elementComputer scienceVoltageElectrical engineeringEngineeringTransistorNanotechnology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this work, we extend the industry standard MIT Virtual Source GaN HEMT (MVSG) model to include layout dependent effects such as scaling of parasitic fringing capacitances, scaling of distributed gate- and channel-resistance, and scaling of thermal network, which target wide-periphery FETs for high-frequency (HF) power amplification applications. Further, we capture the safe-operating area (SOA) of the device by including channel-breakdown in addition to gate-diode breakdown which is useful for high voltage (HV) applications. The modeling approach satisfies Gummel symmetry-benchmarks and is valid for symmetric switch FETs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.807
Threshold uncertainty score0.282

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.220
Teacher spread0.211 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicGaN-based semiconductor devices and materialsFrench-language works237,207