MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3003827677

Compressive behaviour of thin porous layers with application to PEM fuel cells

2019· dissertation· en· W3003827677 on OpenAlexfundno aff
Ali Malekian

Bibliographic record

VenueSummit (Simon Fraser University) · 2019
Typedissertation
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicFuel Cells and Related Materials
Canadian institutionsnot available
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsProton exchange membrane fuel cellMaterials sciencePorosityFuel cellsComposite materialPorous mediumEngineeringChemical engineering
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

A key factor in Polymer Electrolyte Membrane (PEM) fuel cell performance is the compression due to expansion, swelling, and force exerted by bipolar plates on Membrane Electrode Assembly (MEA) which changes the porous microstructure and transport properties of layers in MEA. During manufacturing and operation of fuel cell, MEA goes through numerous cycles of compression, temperature, and humidity, which introduce hygrothermal stresses and result in change in properties of the layers which leads to adjustment of performance. Transport properties such as thermal conductivity, electrical conductivity, and gas diffusivity are dependent on mechanical properties and microstructure of MEA layers, which necessitate the study of their mechanical properties. The focus of this work is compression of Gas Diffusion Layer (GDL) and Catalyst Layer (CL) which play important role in dictating fuel cell performance. In this thesis, mechanical properties of GDL are measured and modeled analytically. Compression tests are performed on three GDL samples (SGL 34BA, Freudenberg, TGP-H-060). The results suggest a non-linear behaviour for pressure-strain curves which is because of their porous nature. Also, using effective medium theory, a representative geometry is introduced for GDL and the mechanical deformation of the simplified geometry is found analytically and validated by experimental data. Moreover, mechanical deformation of five different CL is measured under cyclic compressive load up to 5 MPa for the first time. Results show that CL behaves elastically below 2 MPa and no plastic deformation is observed; the Young’s modulus is decreased with increase in porosity, which was expected. More than that, cyclic compression tests for higher pressures show a slight change in Young’s modulus at higher pressures (more than 2 MPa) which is because of the change in microstructure at higher pressures. A geometrical platform for CL is developed in this study and a mechanistic compression model is developed based on the simplified geometry. The model is validated by comparing with the experimental results obtained for five different CLs. Using the model, effect of compressive load on porosity and pore size distribution is studied which shows significant change in larger pores and shift in pore size distribution curves.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.004
GPT teacher head0.180
Teacher spread0.176 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSummit (Simon Fraser University)→Same topicFuel Cells and Related Materials→French-language works237,207→