MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3003840234 · doi:10.1503/cmaj.190732

Use of a primary care and pharmacy-based model for the delivery of injectable opioid agonist treatment for severe opioid use disorder: a case report

2020· article· en· W3003840234 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Tyler M. Wilson, Rupi Brar, Christy Sutherland, Seonaid Nolan

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Medical Association Journal · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment
Canadian institutionsBritish Columbia Centre on Substance UseUniversity of British Columbia
FundersNational Institute on Drug Abuse
KeywordsOpioid use disorderMedicineHeroinPharmacyPrimary careOpioidBuprenorphinePsychiatryIntensive care medicineFamily medicineInternal medicineDrug

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

KEY POINTS A 48-year-old man presented to his primary care clinic, requesting treatment for severe opioid use disorder (as defined by the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders , 5th Edition ). He reported using intravenous (IV) heroin for the past 20 years and was currently injecting

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.034

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0060.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.003
Open science0.0020.002
Research integrity0.0070.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.034
GPT teacher head0.274
Teacher spread0.240 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations5
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Medical Association Journal→Same topicOpioid Use Disorder Treatment→French-language works237,207→