MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Cubature Particle Filtering Approach for State Estimation in Electrical Distribution Systems

2019· article· en· W3003970291 on OpenAlexaff
Safoan Alhalali, Ramadan El‐Shatshat

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicWater Systems and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParticle filterRobustness (evolution)EstimatorGaussianComputer scienceAlgorithmRange (aeronautics)MATLABState (computer science)State estimatorMathematical optimizationKalman filterMathematicsEngineeringArtificial intelligenceStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Motivated by the increasing need for robust and accurate state estimators, capable of capturing the dynamics of system states and suitable for large-scale distribution networks with a lack of sensors, we introduce a state estimator based on a distributed approach. The proposed estimator technique is based on a combination of the Particle Filter (PF) and the CKF, which yields a Cubature Particle Filter (CPF). This technique employs a PF with the proposal distribution provided by the CKF. Unlike the other types of filters, the PF is a non-Gaussian algorithm from which a true posterior distribution of the estimated states can be obtained. This paper also provides a comparison study between the above mentioned algorithm and the latest algorithms available in the literature. The proposed algorithm were implemented in MATLAB to verify their theoretical expectations. To validate their robustness and accuracy, the proposed methods were tested and verified using a large range of customer loads with 30% uncertainty on a connected IEEE 123-bus system.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.839
Threshold uncertainty score0.245

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.185
Teacher spread0.179 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicWater Systems and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207