MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004060282 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v12n2p32

The Financial Decision Making for Tourism Hotels: Applying Real Options Approach

2020· article· en· W3004060282 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Tung-Li Shih, Yu-Feng Chang, Tyrone T. Lin

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicCapital Investment and Risk Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsInvestment (military)TourismPoint (geometry)Value (mathematics)Return on investmentEconomicsMatching (statistics)Period (music)Investment decisionsInvestment strategyFinanceBusinessMarketingMicroeconomicsComputer scienceBehavioral economicsMathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This paper is to evaluate the optimal threshold value for operating income uncertainty dealt with the investment strategy in tourism industry investor into Sun Moon Lake international tourist hotel market. To price the optimal project value and to provide strategy manager for another decision way of thinking is the focal point in this paper. The way of utilizing the real options approach to assess two periods’ optimal investment strategies for chartered company, to analysis the optimal investment timing for the first period and the second period and to build the optimal two periods’ investment evaluation model. The proposed model is to find the optimal thresholds for the first period and the second period under value-matching and smooth-pasting conditions and to discuss the impact of model parameters upon the investment thresholds for the first period and the second period by numerical analyses. The conclusions provide some valuable references for chartered company to make decisions with a new way of thinking for investment project.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.520
Threshold uncertainty score0.369

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.041
GPT teacher head0.251
Teacher spread0.210 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicCapital Investment and Risk AnalysisFrench-language works237,207