Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Ne il y a plus d’un siecle, le concept d’anesthesie ambulatoire a connu un developpement considerable dans le monde, notamment aux Etats-Unis, au Canada et dans plusieurs pays europeens dont la Grande Bretagne pionnier europeen. Les benefices de l’anesthesie ambulatoire pediatrique sont maintenant admis par tous les acteurs. Outre les avantages economiques, le raccourcissement du temps de separation de l’enfant de ses parents et donc diminution de l’anxiete peri -operatoire. Peu de livres ont ete consacres a l’anesthesie ambulatoire chez l’enfant. Cet ouvrage sur l’anesthesie ambulatoire chez l’enfant a pour objectif de faire le point sur les aspects organisationnels, medicolegaux et de detailler les differentes techniques anesthesiques applicables a la prise en charge ambulatoire chez l’enfant. Les criteres de sortie de l’enfant et la gestion des suites postoperatoires sont egalement abordes. Nous souhaitons qu’il reponde aux interrogations et aux attentes des lecteurs specialistes en anesthesie et chirurgie pediatriques.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.004 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it