Comparaison de la qualité de vie familiale de parents français ayant ou non un enfant avec un trouble du spectre de l’autisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La qualité de vie des familles d’enfant avec un trouble du spectre de l’autisme est affectée dans ses multiples domaines de fonctionnement, que ce soit sur les plans relationnel, psychologique ou encore somatique. Cette étude vise à évaluer, avec le Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale, la qualité de vie des familles d’enfants avec un TSA et de la comparer à celles de parents tout-venant auprès d’une population française. Les résultats montrent une satisfaction moindre de la part des familles d’enfant avec un trouble du spectre de l’autisme avec notamment un bien-être émotionnel significativement inférieur. La présente étude permet de questionner l’outil Beach Center Family Quality of Life Scale dans un contexte culturel nouveau, le contexte français, et discute des perspectives de recherche en lien avec les modèles d’intervention à préconiser auprès des familles.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".