Satisfaction parentale face à un programme de soutien destiné aux parents d’enfants ayant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le programme Au-delà du TED : des compétences parentales à ma portée est un programme de groupe visant à soutenir les parents d’un enfant ayant un trouble du spectre de l’autisme (TSA) à travers les défis rencontrés dans leur quotidien (Stipanicic, Couture, Rivest et Rousseau, 2014, 2017). Le niveau de satisfaction des participants à un programme constitue un élément important à considérer lors de son évaluation. Jumelant des données quantitatives et qualitatives provenant de deux recherches, effectuées en France et au Québec, cette étude examine le niveau de satisfaction de parents ayant participé à ce programme. Il s’avère que les parents ont majoritairement apprécié participer au programme et ont eu le sentiment d’avoir progressé dans leur rôle parental. Ces résultats suggèrent que le programme répond à des besoins parentaux et contribuerait ainsi à améliorer leur bien-être.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".