Novel Regional Activity Representation With Constrained Canonical Correlation Analysis for Brain Connectivity Network Estimation
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Inferring brain connectivity networks from fMRI data can take place at the Region of Interest (ROI) or voxel level. With most ROI-based approaches, the signals from same-ROI voxels are simply averaged, neglecting any inhomogeneity in each ROI and assuming that the same voxels will interact with different ROIs in a similar manner. In this paper, we propose a novel method of representing ROI activity and estimating brain connectivity that takes into account the regionally-specific nature of brain activity, the spatial location of concentrated activity, and activity in other ROIs. The proposed method is able to integrate intrinsic regional structures into a network modelling framework, which we call local activity constrained canonical correlation analysis (LA-cCCA). We evaluated LA-cCCA on both simulated and real fMRI data. The simulation results demonstrated that LA-cCCA had improved accuracy of the estimated brain connectivity networks compared to the average-signal or Principal Component Analysis (PCA)-based correlation methods and the Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA) method. We further examined the performance of LA-cCCA on real fMRI data set from the Human Connectome Project. LA-cCCA outperformed the other three approaches in terms of connectivity reproducibility. The proposed method explores the potentials of regional activity representation and is a reliable model for connectivity network estimation. It may serve as a promising tool for studying both the healthy and diseased brain.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.007 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".