The Association of Pain Phenotype with Neuromuscular Impairments and Mobility Limitations Among Older Primary Care Patients: A Secondary Analysis of the Boston Rehabilitative Impairment Study of the Elderly
Bibliographic record
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Clarifying the relationship between pain phenotypes and physical function in older adults may enhance screening and treatment for functional decline in primary care settings. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the association of more severe pain phenotypes with neuromuscular impairments or mobility limitations among older community-dwelling primary care patients. DESIGN: Cross-sectional analysis. SETTING: The Boston Rehabilitative Impairment Study of the Elderly. PARTICIPANTS: Adults aged 65 years or older. METHODS: We counted the number of musculoskeletal pain locations (none, single site, multisite, or widespread) using the McGill Pain Questionnaire and identified pain intensity tertiles using the Brief Pain Inventory. Neuromuscular attributes (trunk extensor muscle endurance, and leg speed, strength, strength asymmetry, and range of motion) and mobility (Short Physical Performance Battery [SPPB]) were assessed with performance-based measures. Additionally, self-reported mobility was measured on the Late Life Function and Disability Instrument (LLFDI). For neuromuscular attributes and LLFDI, scores in the lowest tertile indicated neuromuscular impairment or mobility limitations, respectively. For SPPB, a score <7 (of 12) indicated severe mobility limitations. RESULTS: Among 430 participants (mean age = 77) most were female (68%), white (83%), and had either multisite (50%) or widespread (14%) pain. After adjusting for baseline characteristics, widespread pain (compared to none) was associated with slow leg speed (adjusted odds ratio, 95% confidence interval: aOR = 2.33, 1.03-5.27), limited ankle range of motion (aOR = 2.15, 1.03-4.47) and mobility limitations on LLFDI (aOR = 3.85, 1.81-8.19). Being in the highest pain intensity tertile, versus lowest tertile, was associated with poor trunk extensor muscle endurance (aOR = 2.49, 1.41-4.39), limited ankle range of motion (aOR = 2.15, 1.25-3.71), and mobility limitations on SPPB (aOR = 2.56, 1.45-4.52), and LLFDI (aOR = 4.70, 2.63-8.40). CONCLUSIONS: Among ambulatory, older primary care patients, more severe pain phenotypes are associated with neuromuscular impairments identified on physical testing and mobility limitations on validated measures.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".