Pediatric syncope diagnosis and management: Validation of continuous blood pressure monitoring and alternatives to 24-hour urine sodium sampling
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Syncope, or fainting, is common and has a devastating impact on quality of life. Diagnosis and management of syncope is challenging. In pediatric populations the current diagnostic gold standard, a tilt test, cannot be safely or properly performed, because the necessary non-invasive beat-to-beat blood pressure monitoring is not validated for children. In addition, low sodium intake is common in syncope patients, and salt supplementation is recommended. However, standard assessments of sodium from urine collections are difficult and unpleasant. This thesis demonstrated that: (i) continuous non-invasive finger blood pressure monitoring provides a novel, comfortable, and accurate approach for use in children compared to an intra-arterial catheter, (ii) Quantab test strips provide a valid alternative to flame photometry for the determination of 24-hour urine sodium levels, and corrected spot sample averages offer an acceptable and convenient alternative to 24-hour urine sampling. These advancements in diagnostic tools for syncope will enhance quality of life for affected individuals.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".