Surface EMG-Based Hand Gesture Recognition via Hybrid and Dilated Deep Neural Network Architectures for Neurorobotic Prostheses
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Motivated by the potentials of deep learning models in significantly improving myoelectric control of neuroprosthetic robotic limbs, this paper proposes two novel deep learning architectures, namely the [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]) and the [Formula: see text] ([Formula: see text]), for performing Hand Gesture Recognition (HGR) via multi-channel surface Electromyography (sEMG) signals. The work is aimed at enhancing the accuracy of myoelectric systems, which can be used for realizing an accurate and resilient man–machine interface for myocontrol of neurorobotic systems. The HRM is developed based on an innovative, unconventional, and particular hybridization of two parallel paths (one convolutional and one recurrent) coupled via a fully-connected multilayer network acting as the fusion center providing robustness across different scenarios. The hybrid design is specifically proposed to treat temporal and spatial features in two parallel processing pipelines and to augment the discriminative power of the model to reduce the required computational complexity and construct a compact HGR model. We designed a second architecture, the [Formula: see text], as a compact architecture. It is worth mentioning that efficiency of a designed deep model, especially its memory usage and number of parameters, is as important as its achievable accuracy in practice. The [Formula: see text] has significantly less memory requirement in training when compared to the HRM due to implementation of novel dilated causal convolutions that gradually increase the receptive field of the network and utilize shared filter parameters. The NinaPro DB2 dataset is utilized for evaluation purposes. The proposed [Formula: see text] significantly outperforms its counterparts achieving an exceptionally-high HGR performance of [Formula: see text]%. The TCNM with the accuracy of [Formula: see text]% also outperforms existing solutions while maintaining low computational requirements.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".