MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004400843 · doi:10.1002/nbm.4264

A multisample 7 T dynamic nuclear polarization polarizer for preclinical hyperpolarized MR

2020· article· en· W3004400843 on OpenAlexaff
Tian Cheng, Adam Gaunt, Irene Marco‐Rius, Marcel Gehrung, Albert P. Chen, Jacques J. van der Klink, Arnaud Comment

Bibliographic record

VenueNMR in Biomedicine · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsGeneral Electric (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPolarizerSpinsHyperpolarization (physics)Polarization (electrochemistry)Nuclear magnetic resonanceLiquid heliumCryostatPhysicsMaterials scienceAtomic physicsChemistryOpticsHeliumCondensed matter physicsNuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopySuperconductivityBirefringence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Dynamic nuclear polarization (DNP) provides the opportunity to boost liquid state magnetic resonance (MR) signals from selected nuclear spins by several orders of magnitude. A cryostat running at a temperature of ~ 1 K and a superconducting magnet set to between 3 and 10 T are required to efficiently hyperpolarize nuclear spins. Several DNP polarizers have been implemented for the purpose of hyperpolarized MR and recent systems have been designed to avoid the need for user input of liquid cryogens. We herein present a zero boil‐off DNP polarizer that operates at 1.35 ± 0.01 K and 7 T, and which can polarize two samples in parallel. The samples are cooled by a static helium bath thermally connected to a 1 K closed‐cycle 4 He refrigerator. Using a modified version of the commercial fluid path developed for the SPINlab polarizer, we demonstrate that, within a 12‐minute interval, the system can produce two separate hyperpolarized 13 C solutions. The 13 C liquid‐state polarization of [1‐ 13 C]pyruvate measured 26 seconds after dissolution was 36%, which can be extrapolated to a 55% solid state polarization. The system is well adapted for in vitro and in vivo preclinical hyperpolarized MR experiments and it can be modified to polarize up to four samples in parallel.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.970
Threshold uncertainty score0.621

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.035
GPT teacher head0.341
Teacher spread0.306 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations33
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNMR in BiomedicineSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207