MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

A Global Similarity Learning for Clustering of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data

2019· article· en· W3004428372 on OpenAlexaff
Xiaoshu Zhu, Lilu Guo, Yunpei Xu, Hong‐Dong Li, Xingyu Liao, Fang‐Xiang Wu, Xiaoqing Peng

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBiochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology
TopicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Saskatchewan
Fundersnot available
KeywordsCluster analysisSimilarity (geometry)Data miningComputer scienceKernel (algebra)Artificial intelligenceFeature (linguistics)Correlation clusteringPattern recognition (psychology)Mathematics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data analysis is a powerful tool for biological researches. Similarity plays an important role in clustering scRNA-seq data. Existing similarity measurements are mainly based on local distance information that is calculated between directly connected node pairs, or shared nearest neighbours' information, without considering the global information. Therefore, these similarity measurements may be not very accurate based on the insufficient information. Based on multi-kernel indices in a global feature space and path-based similarity, we proposed a new similarity measurement for single-cell clustering, called multi-kernel and path-based global similarity (MPGS). In MPGS, global information was incorporated by a new feature space from Spearman correlation coefficient, and a global similarity matrix calculated by multi-kernel. A path-based similarity metric was designed to expand the relevant node range. Based on this similaritiy, a modified Louvain community detection method was applied to cluster the scRNA-seq data, named MPGS-Louvain. To validate the performance of MPGS, the clustering performances of several clustering methods combined with different similarity measurements were compared. To demonstrate the performance of MPGS-Louvain, we compared MPGS-Louvain and five scRNA-seq clustering methods on twenty scRNA-seq datasets. The experimental results showed that MPGS outperformed other similarity measurements, and MPGS-Louvain achieved better performance on these datasets. It can be observed that MPGS provided a new insight to improve the accuracy of clustering scRNA-seq data by considering the global information in similarity measurement. MPGS-Louvain automatically detected clusters accurately without prior knowledge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.134
Threshold uncertainty score0.474

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.037
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.226 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSingle-cell and spatial transcriptomicsFrench-language works237,207