A Global Similarity Learning for Clustering of Single-Cell RNA-Seq Data
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Single-cell RNA-seq (scRNA-seq) data analysis is a powerful tool for biological researches. Similarity plays an important role in clustering scRNA-seq data. Existing similarity measurements are mainly based on local distance information that is calculated between directly connected node pairs, or shared nearest neighbours' information, without considering the global information. Therefore, these similarity measurements may be not very accurate based on the insufficient information. Based on multi-kernel indices in a global feature space and path-based similarity, we proposed a new similarity measurement for single-cell clustering, called multi-kernel and path-based global similarity (MPGS). In MPGS, global information was incorporated by a new feature space from Spearman correlation coefficient, and a global similarity matrix calculated by multi-kernel. A path-based similarity metric was designed to expand the relevant node range. Based on this similaritiy, a modified Louvain community detection method was applied to cluster the scRNA-seq data, named MPGS-Louvain. To validate the performance of MPGS, the clustering performances of several clustering methods combined with different similarity measurements were compared. To demonstrate the performance of MPGS-Louvain, we compared MPGS-Louvain and five scRNA-seq clustering methods on twenty scRNA-seq datasets. The experimental results showed that MPGS outperformed other similarity measurements, and MPGS-Louvain achieved better performance on these datasets. It can be observed that MPGS provided a new insight to improve the accuracy of clustering scRNA-seq data by considering the global information in similarity measurement. MPGS-Louvain automatically detected clusters accurately without prior knowledge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.003 | 0.008 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".