MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004435827

Post-Akkadian and Ur III Features on Cylinder Seals from Kültepe-Kanesh: An Iconographic and Stylistic Analysis

2019· article· en· W3004435827 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Güzel Öztürk

Bibliographic record

VenueDergiPark (Istanbul University) · 2019
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicAncient Near East History
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAkkadianAncient historyBronze AgeQuarter (Canadian coin)BronzeSeal (emblem)ArchaeologyCylinderGeographyHistoryGeometryMathematics
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The cylinder seals uncovered at Kültepe-Kanesh, which date to the last quarter of the Early Bronze Age, are completely foreign to Anatolian sealing practices in terms of both their form and the style of depiction they utilize.These foreign characteristics point to a new and important aspect of the cross-border relations of Anatolia.Cylinder seals, which are known to have been used for the first time in the Uruk period from the second half of the 4 th millennium BC in the Near East, represent a lesser known type for Anatolian geography in the 3 rd millennium BC.Examples of cylinder seals dating to the 3 rd millennium BC apart from Kültepe are known from the excavations of Troy, Alişar, Gordion, and Seyitömer in the northern part of the Taurus Mountains and the inner and western parts of Anatolia.The Kültepe cylinder seals not only contribute to our knowledge about the extent of cylinder seal usage in Anatolia in the 3 rd millennium BC, but also add a new dimension to Anatolian sealing practices via the stylistic features of their compositions and the descriptions on them.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score0.023

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0040.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.166
Teacher spread0.158 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueDergiPark (Istanbul University)Same topicAncient Near East HistoryFrench-language works237,207