Entre convergences et complémentarité : revue de la littérature en sciences sociales et psychologie/psychanalyse sur le décès et le deuil périnatal
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le présent article recense les contributions théoriques et empiriques de la littérature en sciences sociales et en psychologie/psychanalyse sur le sujet du décès/deuil périnatal. Bien que le traitement ait été distinct dans chacune de ces deux littératures, on observe un intérêt convergent pour la question de la non-reconnaissance du décès/deuil périnatal, et son corollaire, les rituels. Cet article s’articule autour de ces deux objets afin de montrer comment ils ont été examinés dans chacune des deux littératures, avant de proposer, en guise de conclusion, des pistes pour poursuivre et complexifier la réflexion sur le sujet.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.030 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.010 | 0.008 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.004 | 0.030 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.015 | 0.029 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.011 |
| Research integrity | 0.004 | 0.012 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".