Study 275: Updated Expanded Access Program for Remestemcel-L in Steroid-Refractory Acute Graft-versus-Host Disease in Children
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Clinical outcomes in children with steroid-refractory acute graft-versus-host disease (SR-aGVHD) are generally poor, with a high mortality rate and limited therapeutic options. Here we report our updated investigational experience with mesenchymal stromal cell (MSC) therapy with remestemcel-L in a multicenter expanded access protocol (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier NCT00759018) in 241 children with aGVHD who failed to respond to steroids with or without other secondary and tertiary immunosuppressive therapies. A total of 241 children with grade B-D SR-aGVHD were enrolled at 50 sites in 8 countries and received 8 biweekly i.v. infusions of human MSCs, 2 × 10 6 per kg for 4 weeks, with an option for an additional 4 weekly infusions after day +28 for subjects who achieved either a partial response (PR) or mixed response. The mean age of the subjects was 9.6 years; 39% were female, and 60% were white. Most of the subjects had grade C (30%) or grade D (50%) disease, and in most cases, the subjects had failed to respond to other immunosuppressive agents after failing steroids. The primary endpoint was overall response (OR; the sum of complete response [CR] and PR) at day +28. Across all subjects, a 28-day OR was observed in 157 patients (65.1%), with 34 (14.1%) achieving CR and 123 (51.3%) achieving PR. Stratified by aGVHD grade at baseline, the OR rate at day +28 was 72.9% for patients with aGVHD grade B, 67.1% for those with aGVHD grade C, and 60.8% for those with aGVHD grade D. Survival through day +100, a secondary endpoint of the study, was 66.9% (n = 160 of 239). Importantly, survival through day +100 was significantly greater in subjects who achieved a day +28 OR compared with nonresponders (82.1% versus 38.6%; P < .001, log-rank test). Remestemcel-L safety was generally well tolerated, with no infusional toxicity and no identified safety concerns. In summary, this update to the remestemcel-L expanded access program confirms the reported clinical and survival benefits of remestemcel-L therapy in children with aGVHD who have exhausted all conventional therapeutic options.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.008 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.008 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".