Aperçu - Cadre des indicateurs de surveillance de la maltraitance envers les enfants
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Le portefeuille de la santé du gouvernement du Canada effectue la surveillance de la violence envers les enfants en tant que problème de santé publique depuis les années 1990. L’Agence de la santé publique du Canada (ASPC) publie aujourd’hui le Cadre d’indicateurs de la maltraitance envers les enfants, qui prend place aux côtés d’autres cadres publiés par l’ASPC, comme le Cadre d’indicateurs de surveillance du suicide. Fondé sur un examen de la portée de revues de la littérature et de méta-analyses, ce cadre, avec l’outil interactif de données en ligne, présente des indicateurs de résultats et des facteurs de risque et de protection de la maltraitance envers les enfants, selon le sexe, l’âge et diverses variables sociodémographiques, aux échelles individuelle, familiale, communautaire et sociétale. Il va constituer une ressource précieuse en lien avec un problème qui affecte au moins un adulte canadien sur trois.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.015 | 0.043 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.003 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".