MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3004559458 · doi:10.5194/soil-2020-2

Multi-cooperation of soil biota in the plough layer is the key for conservationtillage to improve N availability and crop yield

2020· article· en· W3004559458 on OpenAlexaff
Shixiu Zhang, Chang Liang, Neil B. McLaughlin, Shuyan Cui, Haitao Wu, Donghui Wu, Wenju Liang, Aizhen Liang

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsAgriculture and Agri-Food Canada
FundersNortheast Institute of Geography and Agroecology, Chinese Academy of SciencesYouth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of SciencesChangchun Institute of Applied ChemistryPeople's Government of Jilin ProvinceChinese Academy of SciencesNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsTillagePloughTrophic levelAgronomyConventional tillageMineralization (soil science)Soil biologyEnvironmental scienceBiologySoil waterEcologySoil science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Conservation tillage facilitates constructing a more complex and heterogeneous distribution of soil organisms in the plough layer relative to conventional tillage (CT), which results in an improvement in crop yield and nitrogen (N) uptake. However, knowledge of how soil biota interact to couple mineralization of N and promote plant growth is still limited. The contribution of soil biota (trophic groups and energy pathways) to soil N mineralization and the relationship between energy pathways and grain yield during soybean (Glycine max Merr.) growing season were investigated at 0–5 and 5–15 cm depths under a long-term tillage trial. The trial was initiated in 2001 on a Black soil in Northeastern China and included no tillage (NT), ridge tillage (RT) and CT. A higher contribution of most trophic groups to soil N mineralization throughout the whole plough layer was observed in RT and NT than in CT, and these differences were more pronounced for higher trophic groups than for lower ones. Furthermore, the responses of trophic groups to tillage practices were also transferred into the energy pathways. Bacterial and predator-prey pathways released more mineral N in RT and NT than in CT. Multiple regression models revealed that soybean yield was significantly related to the mineralized N in RT and NT through root, fungal and prey-predator pathways in 0–5 cm and bacterial pathway in 5–15 cm. Additionally, the relative contribution of the mineralized N by different pathways to soybean yield was different in 0–5 cm and decreased in the order of root pathway (0.487) > fungal pathway (0.389) > predator-prey pathway (0.318). Although soil trophic groups coupled with N mineralization and soybean yield varied with depth in RT and NT soils, a stable supply of mineral N from soil to plant could be maintained in the plough layer by the cooperation of predator-prey pathway horizontally with bacterial and plant pathways and vertically with fungal and bacterial pathways. This favorable effect of multi-cooperation of soil biota on coupling N mineralization and plant growth in the plough layer is a cornerstone of conservation tillage benefits in temperate areas of the world.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.013

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.058
GPT teacher head0.247
Teacher spread0.189 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→