MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004605337 · doi:10.2217/nmt-2019-0021

Generalized Chorea Associated With Subcortical Leukoaraiosis of Binswanger Type: A Case Report

2020· article· en· W3004605337 on OpenAlexaff
Adrian I. Espiritu, Gerard Saranza, Veeda Michelle M. Anlacan, Cezar Thomas R Suratos, Roland Dominic G. Jamora

Bibliographic record

VenueNeurodegenerative Disease Management · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicCerebrovascular and genetic disorders
Canadian institutionsToronto Western Hospital
Fundersnot available
KeywordsLeukoaraiosisParkinsonismChoreaHyperintensityChoreiform movementPsychologyWhite matterMovement disordersDementiaMedicineMagnetic resonance imagingCardiologyNeuroscienceDiseasePhysical medicine and rehabilitationPathologyRadiologyParkinson's diseaseDyskinesia

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Binswanger disease (BD) involves injuries to the brain small vessels, resulting to gradually progressive subcortical ischemia. This disorder manifests with dementia, gait abnormalities, upper motor signs and parkinsonism, and presents as extensive, confluent, bilateral cerebral white matter hyperintensities in the MRI. Cases of BD typically manifests with vascular risk factors, such as hypertension and multiple strokes. We report a unique case of a Filipino patient whom we have diagnosed with BD presenting with no cardinal signs of parkinsonism, but with generalized choreiform movement disorder and without a history of hypertension and symptomatic strokes. To our knowledge, this is the first report presenting an adult patient with subcortical leukoaraiosis of Binswanger type associated with a hyperkinetic movement disorder.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.003
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0030.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.260
Teacher spread0.234 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueNeurodegenerative Disease ManagementSame topicCerebrovascular and genetic disordersFrench-language works237,207