MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Application of aerosol extinguishing agents to increase infrastructure safety

2020· article· en· W3004623630 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
David Kroca, Karel Klouda

Bibliographic record

VenueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental Science · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFlame retardant materials and properties
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsConvention on Biological DiversityFire protectionEnvironmental scienceConventionArchitectural engineeringForensic engineeringEngineeringBiodiversityLawCivil engineeringPolitical scienceEcology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Fire protection of buildings, their sets and in the broader concept of the hole built-up and state undeveloped territory is one of the basic conditions of any advanced human society. The current scientific knowledge of extinguishing agent different types allows more fires to be managed adequately and effectively. Aerosol fire extinguishers belong to relatively newly developed methods of fire protection connected with buildings and technical infrastructure. By their nature, properties, effects and ecologically sound, this technology has received much attention from the gradual phasing out and reduction of halogen extinguishing agents since the early 1980s, due to the Montreal Convention. Very surprising results and improvement were reached due to modern carbon nanocomposites such as graphene oxide, fullerene and its modifications which were not intended to be used in such fields at all. But thanks to their in-depth examination and advanced technology their exploitation seem to be unlimited.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.021
Threshold uncertainty score0.717

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.200
Teacher spread0.188 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIOP Conference Series Earth and Environmental ScienceSame topicFlame retardant materials and propertiesFrench-language works237,207