Multi-modal normalization of resting-state using local physiology reduces changes in functional connectivity patterns observed in mTBI patients
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Blood oxygenation level dependent (BOLD) resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) may serve as a sensitive marker to identify possible changes in the architecture of large-scale networks following mild traumatic brain injury (mTBI). Differences in functional connectivity (FC) measurements derived from BOLD rs-fMRI may however be confounded by changes in local cerebrovascular physiology and neurovascular coupling mechanisms, without changes in the underlying neuronally driven connectivity of networks. In this study, multi-modal neuroimaging data including BOLD rs-fMRI, baseline cerebral blood flow (CBF0) and cerebrovascular reactivity (CVR; acquired using a hypercapnic gas breathing challenge) were collected in 23 subjects with reported mTBI (14.6±14.9 months post-injury) and 27 age-matched healthy controls. Despite no group differences in CVR within the networks of interest (P > 0.05, corrected), significantly higher CBF0 was documented in the mTBI subjects (P < 0.05, corrected), relative to the controls. A normalization method designed to account for differences in CBF0 post-mTBI was introduced to evaluate the effects of such an approach on reported group differences in network connectivity. Inclusion of regional perfusion measurements in the computation of correlation coefficients within and across large-scale networks narrowed the differences in FC between the groups, suggesting that this approach may elucidate unique changes in connectivity post-mTBI while accounting for shared variance with CBF0. Altogether, our results provide a strong paradigm supporting the need to account for changes in physiological modulators of BOLD in order to expand our understanding of the effects of brain injury on large-scale FC of cortical networks.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.026 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".