MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Reducing CPV Materials Cost Through Multistage Concentration

2019· article· en· W3004656591 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
Topicsolar cell performance optimization
Canadian institutionsInstitut interdisciplinaire d'innovation technologiqueUniversité de Sherbrooke
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParabolic troughCost of electricity by sourceDurabilityCapital costCost reductionTandemSiliconTrough (economics)Materials scienceProcess engineeringEnvironmental scienceComputer scienceElectricity generationSolar energyComposite materialPower (physics)EngineeringElectrical engineeringOptoelectronicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In PV manufacturing, process costs fall rapidly with scale, but a slower decrease in material costs limits cost reduction. Analysis of a proposed multi-stage-concentration module shows that even with additional concentration stages for low tandem-cell cost, initial concentration by a trough mirror can greatly reduce overall materials usage compared to Fresnel/box CPV. A compact sealed module at the trough's focus allows high-performance materials for efficiency and durability, and estimated costs (⊄/W, LCOE, capital-to-scale) compare favorably to even silicon PV.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.146
Threshold uncertainty score0.999

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.009
GPT teacher head0.213
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2019
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicsolar cell performance optimizationFrench-language works237,207