MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004705971 · doi:10.1186/s13063-020-4080-2

Aim2Be mHealth intervention for children with overweight and obesity: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

2020· article· en· W3004705971 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Louise C. Mâsse, Janae Vlaar, Janice Macdonald, Jennifer Bradbury, Tom Warshawski, E. Jean Buckler, Jill Hamilton, Josephine Ho, Annick Buchholz, Katherine M. Morrison, Geoff D.C. Ball

Bibliographic record

VenueTrials · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldHealth Professions
TopicMobile Health and mHealth Applications
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaLMC Diabetes & Endocrinology (Canada)Children's Hospital of Eastern OntarioUniversity of CalgaryCanadian Obesity NetworkSickKids FoundationBC Children's HospitalUniversity of TorontoHospital for Sick ChildrenVictoria General HospitalUniversity of British Columbia
FundersInstitute of Nutrition, Metabolism and DiabetesObesity CanadaCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchMerck CanadaAlberta InnovatesPublic Health AgencyOntario Ministry of Health and Long-Term CareDavid Suzuki FoundationBC Children's HospitalWomen and Children's Health Research InstituteDiabetes CanadaPublic Health Agency of CanadaChildren's Health Research InstituteAlberta Health Services
KeywordsOverweightMedicinemHealthCoachingRandomized controlled trialPsychological interventionChildhood obesityObesityBehavior changeWeight managementBody mass indexIntervention (counseling)Health coachingPhysical therapyScreen timeGerontologyBehavior change methodsPhysical activityPsychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of overweight and obesity remains high in Canada, and the current standard for the treatment of childhood obesity is in-person, family-based, multidisciplinary interventions that target lifestyle behaviors (e.g., diet, physical activity, and sedentary behaviors). These programs are costly to operate, have limited success, and report recruitment and retention challenges. With recent advances in technology, mobile health or mHealth has been presented as a viable alternative to in-person interventions for behavior change, especially with teens. PURPOSE: The primary aim of this study is to test the efficacy of Aim2Be, a gamified app based on behavior change theory with health coaching to improve weight outcomes (i.e., decrease in standardized body mass index (zBMI)) and lifestyle behaviors (i.e., improve dietary quality, increase fruit and vegetable intake, reduce sugar-sweetened beverage intake, increase physical activity, and reduce screen time) among children 10- to 17-years old with overweight or obesity versus their peers randomized into a waitlist control condition. The secondary aims of this study are to 1) test whether supplementing the Aim2Be program with health coaching increases adherence and 2) examine the mediators and moderators of adherence to the Aim2Be intervention. METHODS: We will employ a randomized controlled trial design and recruit 200 child and parent dyads to participate in the study (2019-2020). Participants will be recruited from Canadian pediatric weight management clinics and through online advertisements. Child participants must be between the ages of 10 and 17 years, have overweight or obesity, be able to read English at least at a grade 5 level, and have a mobile phone or home computer with internet access. Following baseline data collection, participants will be randomized into intervention and waitlist control groups. Intervention participants will receive access to Aim2Be, with access to health coaching. After having their data collected for 3 months, the control group will gain access to Aim2Be, with no access to health coaching. Participants will control their frequency and duration of app usage to promote autonomy. DISCUSSION: Findings from this study will determine the efficacy of using Aim2Be in improving child weight outcomes and lifestyle behaviors and guide future mHealth interventions for pediatric weight management. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT03651284. Registered 29 August 2018.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.019
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.008
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.017
Threshold uncertainty score0.928

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0190.008
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.163
GPT teacher head0.534
Teacher spread0.371 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations27
Published2020
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTrialsSame topicMobile Health and mHealth ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207