MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004744147 · doi:10.1002/pssa.201900987

<i>T</i>* of Relaxor Ferroelectric (1 − <i>x</i>) Pb(Zn<sub>1/3</sub>Nb<sub>2/3</sub>)O<sub>3</sub>‐<i>x</i>PbTiO<sub>3</sub> Single Crystals Revisited Using Brillouin Spectroscopy

2020· article· en· W3004744147 on OpenAlexafffund
Furqanul Hassan Naqvi, Jeong Woo Lee, Jae‐Hyeon Ko, Wenzhi Chen, Alexei A. Bokov, Zuo‐Guang Ye, Shinya Tsukada, Seiji Kojima

Bibliographic record

Venuephysica status solidi (a) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMaterials Science
TopicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric Materials
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
FundersU.S. Naval Research LaboratoryNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Research Foundation of Korea
KeywordsMaterials scienceCondensed matter physicsBrillouin zonePolarPhase (matter)Phase transitionDielectricBrillouin scatteringSoft modesFerroelectricityPhysicsOptics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The relaxor characteristics of Pb[(Zn 1/3 Nb 2/3 ) 1– x Ti x ]O 3 (PZN‐ x PT) single crystals (with x = 0 and x = 0.08) are investigated using temperature‐dependent Brillouin scattering spectroscopy. The longitudinal acoustic (LA) mode shows typical relaxor behaviors for PZN, whereas its mode frequency exhibits a discontinuous change at the phase transition temperature ( T C ) for PZN‐8%PT. The transverse acoustic (TA) mode, which is forbidden in an ideal cubic phase at the backscattering geometry, appears in both samples at a certain temperature above either the dielectric maximum temperature ( T m ) or T C . This breakdown of the Brillouin selection rule in the cubic phase indicates that the noncubic polar regions become appreciable at this temperature where the interaction between the acoustic waves and the polar nanoregions (PNRs) is strong enough to enable the appearance of the TA mode. The intermediate characteristic temperature T * is determined in terms of the minimum of the temperature derivative of the half width of the LA mode, and the values are nearly the same as those determined via the acoustic emission signal measurements. These comparisons reveal the universal feature of the local phase transformation from dynamic to quasistatic PNRs at T *, giving rise to the appearance of the TA mode.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.012
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0040.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.007
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.243
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; both teacher heads agree on what is shown here.

Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuephysica status solidi (a)Same topicFerroelectric and Piezoelectric MaterialsFrench-language works237,207