MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004774263 · doi:10.1515/css-2020-0007

Introduction to the 2020 Peirce Section

2020· article· en· W3004774263 on OpenAlexaff
Cary Campbell

Bibliographic record

VenueChinese Semiotic Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicDigital Humanities and Scholarship
Canadian institutionsSimon Fraser University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsPragmatismSection (typography)Representation (politics)SemioticsDisciplineEpistemologySocial semioticsSociologyPhilosophyComputer scienceSocial sciencePolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Peirce section editor Cary Campbell introduces a series of short articles from Mary Keeler, on improving digital access to the Peirce manuscripts (in particular, his late unpublished manuscripts), discussing and exploring possibilities for their effective communication, preservation, (multimodal) representation, and augmentation through technology. Keeler develops an approach to this research stemming from Peirce’s own mutually supporting pragmatism and synechism and his theory of social learning and inquiry. She argues for an ontological approach to cataloguing the archive in a way that can “accommodate diverse disciplinary perspectives.”

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Editorial · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.101
Threshold uncertainty score0.337

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0050.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0030.004
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1010.033

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.054
GPT teacher head0.262
Teacher spread0.208 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEditorial

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueChinese Semiotic StudiesSame topicDigital Humanities and ScholarshipFrench-language works237,207