Structure‐Activity Relationships for Bis(phenolate‐ether) Zr/Hf Propene Polymerization Catalysts
Bibliographic record
Abstract
A series of 20 bis(phenolate‐ether) ligands, in combination with Zr and Hf, was tested for performance in propene polymerization, focusing on molecular weight, stereoregularity and regioregularity of the resulting polymer. Ligand variation covers length of the aliphatic linker between the ligand halves, as well as steric bulk of the groups ortho to the phenolate oxygen. The linker length has a dramatic effect on MW: two‐carbon linkers produce oligomers (M n < 2.5 kDa) while three‐ and four‐carbon linkers generate much higher MW (M n typically 50–500 kDa). Stereoselectivity can be tuned using large, flat substituents in the o ‐phenolate position; tuning of regioselectivity is much harder. Hf catalysts are slower than their Zr analogs and do not work well with MAO/BHT (BHT = 2,6‐di‐ tert ‐butyl‐4‐methylphenol); they are generally more selective (MW, stereo and regio). Density functional calculations agree fairly well with observed selectivities, supporting the involvement of a fac/fac coordinated active species. These O4 catalysts are considerably more flexible than e.g. metallocenes, making accurate prediction of PP microstructure a significant challenge.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.007 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".