MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004869819 · doi:10.1002/9781119532637.ch5

Environmental Exposure and Risk in Autoimmune Liver Diseases

2020· other· en· W3004869819 on OpenAlexaff
Ying Qi Li, Andrew L. Mason

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typeother
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicLiver Diseases and Immunity
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Alberta
Fundersnot available
KeywordsAutoimmune hepatitisImmunologyGenetic predispositionAutoimmune diseaseDiseaseMolecular mimicryPathogenesisMedicineAntibodyBiologyHepatitisPathology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

It is generally accepted that autoimmune liver diseases arise as a result of a complex interaction of environmental factors on the background of genetic predisposition to disease. This chapter reviews the research into the environmental triggers linked with primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) and factors linked with autoimmune hepatitis. Human leukocyte antigen polymorphisms have been closely linked with the development of autoimmune disease, drug hypersensitivity, and persistence of viral infection, whereas other polymorphisms provide protection against developing autoimmune disease, vasculitis, and clearance of viral infection. There are several models and clinical observations illustrating how an environmental agent can trigger an autoimmune response, some of which are not mutually exclusive. The involvement of xenobiotics in the pathogenesis of PBC is supported by epidemiologic clustering studies around coal mines and toxic waste sites as well as by animal models modified by specific chemical compounds to elicit the PBC specific antimitochondrial antibody response.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.008
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0080.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicLiver Diseases and ImmunityFrench-language works237,207