MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004882514 · doi:10.1109/twc.2020.2970002

Joint Impact of I/Q Imbalance and Imperfect CSI on SM-MIMO Systems Over Generalized Beckmann Fading Channels: Optimal Detection and Cramer-Rao Bound

2020· article· en· W3004882514 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Wireless Communications · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced Wireless Communication Technologies
Canadian institutionsLakehead University
FundersTürkiye Bilimsel ve Teknolojik Araştırma Kurumu
KeywordsCramér–Rao boundFadingMIMOUpper and lower boundsPairwise error probabilityChannel state informationAlgorithmComputer scienceEstimatorChannel (broadcasting)StatisticsTelecommunicationsMathematicsControl theory (sociology)Wireless

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Spatial modulation (SM) has been shown to be a promising low-complexity alternative to the state-of-art multiple-input multiple-output (MIMO) schemes due to its novel transmission approach. This paper investigates the performance of SM-MIMO systems in the presence of two practical undesirable effects, namely in-phase (I) and quadrature-phase (Q) imbalance (IQI) and imperfect channel state information (ICSI). An optimum maximum likelihood detection (MLD) method is proposed to tackle the effects of self-interference and signal distortion caused by IQI impairment by adapting the traditional MLD technique in accordance with the asymmetric characteristics of the IQI. More particularly, upper-bounds of the closed-form average pairwise error probability (APEP) and the average bit error rate (ABER) are derived for generalized Beckmann fading channels. As erroneously interpreted channel coefficients at the receiver (Rx) cause the error rate to increase and the detection to fall short, Cramer-Rao bound, which is a lower bound on the variance of the channel estimator, is utilized to assess the estimation accuracy. The system performance is evaluated by analytical derivations that are corroborated with computer simulations. The obtained results show that ICSI and IQI should be seriously considered while designing the future SM-based wireless communication systems.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.324
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.033
GPT teacher head0.271
Teacher spread0.238 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it