MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004889067 · doi:10.1093/gbe/evaa019

An Ancient Baboon Genome Demonstrates Long-Term Population Continuity in Southern Africa

2020· letter· en· W3004889067 on OpenAlexaff
Iain Mathieson, Federico Abascal, Lasse Vinner, Pontus Skoglund, Cristina Pomilla, Peter Mitchell, Charles Arthur, Deepti Gurdasani, Eske Willerslev, Manj S. Sandhu, Genevieve Dewar

Bibliographic record

VenueGenome Biology and Evolution · 2020
Typeletter
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicWildlife Ecology and Conservation
Canadian institutionsThe Scarborough HospitalUniversity of Toronto
FundersNational Institute of General Medical SciencesEuropean Research CouncilNational Institutes of HealthH. Lundbeck A/SMedical Research CouncilDanmarks GrundforskningsfondUniversity of OxfordLundbeckfondenNovo Nordisk FondenCancer Research UKWellcome TrustFrancis Crick InstituteCharles E. Kaufman FoundationWellcomeCarlsbergfondetNational Research FoundationAlfred P. Sloan Foundation
KeywordsBaboonBiologyPopulationEvolutionary biologyZoologyPapio anubisEcologyDemography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Baboons are one of the most abundant large nonhuman primates and are widely studied in biomedical, behavioral, and anthropological research. Despite this, our knowledge of their evolutionary and demographic history remains incomplete. Here, we report a 0.9-fold coverage genome sequence from a 5800-year-old baboon from the site of Ha Makotoko in Lesotho. The ancient baboon is closely related to present-day Papio ursinus individuals from southern Africa-indicating a high degree of continuity in the southern African baboon population. This level of population continuity is rare in recent human populations but may provide a good model for the evolution of Homo and other large primates over similar timespans in structured populations throughout Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.011
Threshold uncertainty score0.958

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.013
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.203 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations18
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGenome Biology and EvolutionSame topicWildlife Ecology and ConservationFrench-language works237,207