MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004919820 · doi:10.22610/jebs.v11i6(j).2951

Is the increasing rate of unemployment a worst nightmare facing South Africa?

2020· article· en· W3004919820 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Edward Kagiso Molefe

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Economics and Behavioral Studies · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldBusiness, Management and Accounting
TopicEntrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsUnemploymentQuarter (Canadian coin)EconomicsNightmareDeveloping countryStandard of livingDemographic economicsPer capitaPer capita incomeDevelopment economicsLabour economicsEconomic growthGeographyDemographyPsychologySociologyPopulation

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Unemployment remains one of the major economic and social challenges facing both developed and developing countries. To date, it still remain a policy concern particularly in developing countries where lot of people go through long spells of joblessness, considerable loss of individual income and severe cut in standard of living. In South Africa, Unemployment has been unquestionably high particularly among the youth. This follows the publicized Stats SA quarterly labour survey of 2019 that revealed a 1.8 percentage points increase from 27.2% in the second quarter of 2018 to 29 per cent in the second quarter of 2019. Therefore, the primary motivation of this current study was to analyse the effects of increasing unemployment is South Africa with the aim of recommending possible solutions to the problem. The study employed annual time series data spanning the period 1989 to 2019. The results of the study revealed that GDP per capita, gross national income growth and literacy levels are negatively related with unemployment. This implied that increase in these variables would assist with unemployment reduction in South Africa.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.640
Threshold uncertainty score0.294

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.125
GPT teacher head0.282
Teacher spread0.156 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Economics and Behavioral StudiesSame topicEntrepreneurship Studies and InfluencesFrench-language works237,207