MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004942278

La littérature, un art visuel comme les autresN?

2020· article· fr· W3004942278 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Jean-Michel Lapointe

Bibliographic record

VenueSens public · 2020
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldComputer Science
TopicCultural Insights and Digital Impacts
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsOmnipresenceHumanitiesPhilosophyArtEpistemology
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Compte-rendu de l’ouvrage L’Ecriture sans ecriture de l’ecrivain conceptuel americain Kenneth Goldsmith paru chez Jean Boite Editions dans une traduction de Francois Bon. Ce recueil d’essais explore la philosophie de la creation litteraire de l’auteur, qui est ici synthetisee suivant trois elements centraux relatifs a l’environnement numerique contemporainN: la situation d’abondance et d’omnipresence du langage, la generalisation du copier-coller et l’idee suivant laquelle «Nle contexte est le nouveau contenuN». Provocatrice et suggestive, cette approche de la creation emancipee du geste de lecture culmine dans un plaidoyer democratique qui laisse sceptique.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.906
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0050.003
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.367
GPT teacher head0.312
Teacher spread0.055 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueSens publicSame topicCultural Insights and Digital ImpactsFrench-language works237,207