MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3004949501 · doi:10.4000/geocarrefour.13873

Le retour des ceintures maraîchères ? Une étude de la proximité géographique des AMAP en Bouches-du-Rhône (2006-2015)

2019· article· fr· W3004949501 on OpenAlex
Noé Guiraud

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueGéocarrefour · 2019
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicOrganic Food and Agriculture
Canadian institutionsUniversité Laval
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesGeographyPolitical sciencePhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Les Amap sont un système alternatif de commercialisation alimentaire qui a été créé dans l’optique de rapprocher consommateurs et producteurs. L’organisation des Amap repose sur la relocalisation de l’échange alimentaire. En voulant observer les implications géographiques de cette organisation nous interrogeons aussi leur territorialité. Pour ce faire nous nous appuyons sur trois recensements des lieux de distribution et des fermes maraîchères en Bouches du Rhône, en 2006, 2010 et 2015. Nous montrons comment le système spatial des Amap repose sur trois relations spatiales : l’inter-relation des lieux du système Amap, le rôle des géographies agricoles et urbaines, et la distance comme indicateur du graphe géographique de l’Amap. Nous en tirons une typologie des Amap, qui rend compte de leurs rapports différenciés au territoire.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.196 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it