Le retour des ceintures maraîchères ? Une étude de la proximité géographique des AMAP en Bouches-du-Rhône (2006-2015)
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Les Amap sont un système alternatif de commercialisation alimentaire qui a été créé dans l’optique de rapprocher consommateurs et producteurs. L’organisation des Amap repose sur la relocalisation de l’échange alimentaire. En voulant observer les implications géographiques de cette organisation nous interrogeons aussi leur territorialité. Pour ce faire nous nous appuyons sur trois recensements des lieux de distribution et des fermes maraîchères en Bouches du Rhône, en 2006, 2010 et 2015. Nous montrons comment le système spatial des Amap repose sur trois relations spatiales : l’inter-relation des lieux du système Amap, le rôle des géographies agricoles et urbaines, et la distance comme indicateur du graphe géographique de l’Amap. Nous en tirons une typologie des Amap, qui rend compte de leurs rapports différenciés au territoire.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.004 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".